|
Shouldn't this remove the one for C? Wouldn't C's be at the "top"?
And if I have the MONMSG CPF2103 immediately after the ADDLIBLE C I can't
begin to fathom what message might be removed prior to it. I hate testing
on a several hour long program and prefer unit testing.
I'm willing to try something else though. What does your full RCVMSG look
like? Like, Mark Waterbury's?
RCVMSG PGMQ(*SAME (*)) MSGTYPE(*EXCP) MSGKEY(*NONE) +
WAIT(0) RMV(*YES)
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.