RE: CHGOBJAUD of *CMD never gets logged; who did CHGWTR

["Dennis Lovelady" <iseries@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> I've heard of an approach of creating a command of the same name and
> with the same parameters as an IBM command, and have a CPP that
> basically runs the system command from there. This command and CPP
> would
> be placed above QSYS in the system portion of the library list.
>
> Does that sound familiar? Or am I in desperate need of a vacation?

That is how I implemented my tape management system in another life.  Works
great; the only issue being that as IBM adds parameters/options (which
happened a lot with the SAV* commands back then) there was rework to be
done.  But this gave access to the before and after, visibility to the
command's success, and so on.

Still, the exit point is probably a better answer if only because of the
rework.

Dennis Lovelady
http://www.linkedin.com/in/dennislovelady
--
You can't have everything.  Where would you put it?