QPRCMLTTSK system value -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: QPRCMLTTSK system value
From: Pete Hall <pete@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 18:01:05 -0600
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I'm considering setting QPRCMLTTSK to '1' on an 825 (V540) for improved
Java performance. Does anyone have any horror stories about it? Heavy
batch processing occurs on this system each night, and there's still a
significant single threaded interactive/batch mix during the day. Since
this setting is inherited from the controlling partition on 7xx and 8xx
machines, I can't test it on the dev LPAR first.

- --
Pete Hall
pete@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkuJsj0ACgkQXczQcKdXKg4FNACfVKAv1fIviepIxjHkTD7UAQKz
6lgAoKbVQkkLJhu5ysZoN1tT3e4p4YQl
=B7uy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.