Re: qopensys etc.

[Scott Klement <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

There was a licpgm (Zend server, perhaps?) that wouldn't install 
properly if one or the other was a symlink.  Now I can't remember which 
way caused the problem...    but it failed to install to a symlinked 
directory, so you had to do the link in the other direction.

It was annoying.

Dennis Lovelady wrote:
> One could also symlink /usr/local to /QOpenSys/usr/local.  It's a matter of
> semantics and preference.  If you find a system that already has one but not
> both of these, my advice is to symlink the other to it rather than doing a
> lot of finagling to meet that spec as written. Scott may find reason to
> differ on that point.  I'd like to hear it.