Lukas -

No offense intended, but life in your idealized world is not as easy as it
is in the real world. Most AS/400 - iSeries - System i - IBM i shops are
running code that was written over 20 years ago, and have no intention of
'fixing' it to match your conception of 'right'.

- sjl


Lukas wrote:
No. Proper program logic should ensure that something like this can't
be destructive - running the same job twice should result in a "job x
is already running" message. This can be achieved by proper locking.
Forcing a single-batch job to fix problems in the application logic..
Well, it works - but it's a workaround, not a proper solution.

What can be a reason for running only a single batch job can be
performance, but this is going to be less and less of an issue...




This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.