Lukas -

No offense intended, but life in your idealized world is not as easy as it
is in the real world. Most AS/400 - iSeries - System i - IBM i shops are
running code that was written over 20 years ago, and have no intention of
'fixing' it to match your conception of 'right'.

- sjl


Lukas wrote:
No. Proper program logic should ensure that something like this can't
be destructive - running the same job twice should result in a "job x
is already running" message. This can be achieved by proper locking.
Forcing a single-batch job to fix problems in the application logic..
Well, it works - but it's a workaround, not a proper solution.

What can be a reason for running only a single batch job can be
performance, but this is going to be less and less of an issue...




As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.