I don't really have a compelling reason.

And it's certainly not because I've run out of things to do.
:)

On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 2:31 PM, David Gibbs <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Jeff Crosby wrote:
I store no /COPY source in QRPGSRC, so other than debug issues, do you
see
any pitfalls in renaming QRPGSRC to QRPGLESRC?

Other than existing source references (in objects) being wrong, I can't see
any problems.

Of course, I also can't see any upside to renaming the source PF. If
QRPGSRC works, why bother changing it?

david

--
IBM i on Power Systems - For when you can't afford to be out of business
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.





As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.