RE: CL for Backup Alerts -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: RE: CL for Backup Alerts
From: rob@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 09:53:34 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

I can understand why. We've had backup's hang for some really obscure
reasons - reasons that took IBM a month or two to come out with a new ptf.
If it is 'hung' and the users are about to show up for their shift we
want to abort it and start processes back up.

We do the CHKTAP early on, before killing any processes. If we end it
because of that we send the message out right away.

MSGW? Don't know as if I would wait until the same time that we do the
first part before we cared.

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.