On 6/11/2010 12:14 PM, Lukas Beeler wrote:
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 13:24,<rob@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
When we had the IXS cards we had 90 disk arms. How many disk arms does
your traditional PC server have?
In a modern environment, 2 or Zero. The rest is on the SAN. SANs are
common place nowadays, even in small shops.

Which of course makes his point. Spread your workloads across many arms. IBM i and it's predecessor operating systems have had SAN like capabilities for a very very long time. Many shops with IBM i have zero SAN knowledge but they know how to manage IBM i very well. In those situations use the i for the SAN. It doesn't fit all users of course but for many it works very well. If you don't SAN your disks one way or the other, PC Server disk usage is typically above 90% full or below 10% full, adding disks is a pain and almost no one knows how busy the disks are, only how full they are. In addition for the small shops a SAVE 21 that gets 'the whole 9 yards' including all the PC servers is a wonderful thing to help you sleep at night. Backing up a SAN is mostly backing up every individual server or making sure you have two SANs and replicating them off-site. Wonderful if you've got a large enough company and knowledge to manage it but not something to step into lightly.

- DrFranken

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.