Is CHAIN always faster? If the large majority of the data access is failing
(the records are not found), then CHAIN is going to be quicker, because
SETLL has to position the file pointer to EOF, and with 20 Million Records,
that might slow things down slightly.
At least that's what Barbara Morris seemed to think here -
http://forums.systeminetwork.com/isnetforums/showthread.php?t=49800
Not sure if that's what is happening in this case, or if there is anything
OP can do, as the file seems to grow and then get smaller, based on the
description...
----- Original Message -----
From: "Charles Wilt" <charles.wilt@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "Midrange Systems Technical Discussion" <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 1:42 PM
Subject: Re: System slow-down - disk usage?
SETLL does keyed access, and is faster than a chain if all you want to
know is does the record exist.
Charles
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.