RE: Problem solved, Re: Sorting DSPOBJD outfile by ascending date -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: RE: Problem solved, Re: Sorting DSPOBJD outfile by ascending date
From: rob@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 08:31:55 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Maybe they've not modified the usage of a field. And it's not as if I
said they have. What I said was they've modified the file layouts, which
you agree they have. Would it be so terrible if they did modify a field
format? For example, would it have been worse to modify the format of the
object size field instead of the stupid "if the size field is all nines
then take some other field and multiply by yet another field to calculate
object size"?

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

RE: Problem solved, Re: Sorting DSPOBJD outfile by ascending date , Dennis Lovelady

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.