That's a good idea, Sharon, but MAINT(*REBUILD) is not an option when UNIQUE
is involved. So there is some merit to the approach depending upon how
things are set up. Some installations that don't really understand database
but are put in the position of designing for i have UNIQUE on (almost)
everything.

Dennis Lovelady
http://www.linkedin.com/in/dennislovelady
--
Dear Lord, please make me the kind of person my cats think I am.


Rather than remove the members, you could just change the LF to
maint(*REBLD) instead of removing the members.

Then once you are done with the reorg, change them back to
maint(*Immed).

This way you don't lose the based-on member info. I have seen this
cause a problem when the logical is based on multiple physical members.
Re-adding logical members isn't fun for multiple physical members.

Plus, if the LF has multiple members, its not fun either.



Sharon Wintermute



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.