Re: Cume PTF

[Vern Hamberg <vhamberg@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I don't think you get multiple entries - that'd be silly if IBM did it 
that way.

Last time I got a link loader error was when trying to get caught up on 
a v5r1 machine - I mean REALLY caught up. There were tons of PTFs, and 
the link loader process couldn't handle the quantity, as Larry 
described. Now I keep more current than I did.

Vern

> Doesn't the cume overlap (somewhat) with the all the rest?  So are
> you really quintuppling the number of PTFs?
>
> --Paul E Musselman
> PaulMmn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> At 8:46 PM -0400 10/21/10, DrFranken wrote (in part):
> >   I last tested this with V5R4M0 base load and then applying every
> > PTF group I had available including CUME, DB, HIPER, HTTP, JAVA, Windows
> > Integration, TCP, PRINT, Websphere and probably more. It did not break.