Re: LUD list

[CRPence <CRPbottle@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 12/1/10 6:53 AM, jmmckee wrote:
> The shop is at v5r4.  No current on PTFs.  Not something I am allowed
> or responsible for doing.  The SA does not like to get involved with
> this stuff.  And, as I have posted before, is antisocial.
>
> We had a spate of devices that would not connect in 2006.  At the
> time, I learned that there was a maximum number that could/should be
> assigned to a subsystem.  I passed that on to the SA, who ignored it.
> The device issues continued.  He *finally* contacted IBM and was
> given a procedure to recover devices that get hung.  He was also told
> to create an additional subsystem, which he did.  Problem went away.
> It is now back.  Three devices, in two days, so far have been hung.
>
> The procedure from IBM was to do a
> DMPSYSOBJ OBJ(PASSTHRU#LUD#LIST) CONTEXT(QSYS) TYPE(0E) SUBTYPE(EF)
>
> scan the spool file for the hung device
>
> If found, vary off the device and then issue this command:
> CALL PGM(QSPTLIB/QPARIXEN) PARM('device name')
>
> That works.
>
> My question (sorry about the length of this), does anybody know if
> the underlying problem has been addressed by an APAR and PTF?
>
> If, such exists, I >might<  be able to get my supervisor to persuade
> the sa (who he also directs or tries to) to apply either the latest
> cum or a specific PTF.
>
> This is nuts.
>
> Sorry for the rant and length.  Just gets frustrating.

  If the IBM support did not give an APAR number describing the origin 
of the problem being diagnosed and corrected by the noted dump and 
corrective actions, then as merely a guess... I think that the HIPer 
APAR SE43904 might identify the problem, with the PTF SI40274 on 
C0292540 being the fix.  Since the application of that PTF along with 
the other PTFs on the v5r4m0 HIPer list is a good choice for a minimal 
level of maintenance, application of the HIPers would seem appropriate 
IMO; that would include SI40691, which should prevent a temporary 
storage leak associated with similar code.  Of course applying the 
cumulative versus just the HIPers might be an even better choice :-)

http://www-912.ibm.com/n_dir/nas4apar.NSF/b6c9b771e38b5ea2862564c00079d110/a8718ceab7a1e90d8625774c003c92bd?OpenDocument
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=nas2a8718ceab7a1e90d8625774c003c92bd
http://www-912.ibm.com/s_dir/sline003.NSF/2d3aff1c6b4d6ce086256453000d971e/63b317b8c13a2a7e8625710f005c4fdd?OpenDocument
https://www-304.ibm.com/jct01003c/support/docview.wss?uid=nas39bf24152d89d03118625777500007af7

Regards, Chuck