Re: CRTSRVPGM

[Barbara Morris <bmorris@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 2011/1/13 7:32 AM, dieter.bender@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> there are very few cases binder language might be usefull:
> - binding multiple modules to one SRVPGM

I don't see how a one-module-per-srvpgm rule helps to avoid binder language.

If you are willing to recompile all the programs when you change a 
service program, then you don't need binder language no matter how many 
modules are in the service programs.

But if you want to avoid recompiling all the programs, then it isn't 
sufficient to have only one module in each service program.  You also 
need to limit it to only one exported procedure per module.  I think the 
awkwardness of binder language is trivial compared to the awkwardness of 
a constraint that only allows one procedure per module.