Re: Avoiding redundant triggers? -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: Avoiding redundant triggers?
From: "James H. H. Lampert" <jamesl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 10:40:09 -0800
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Luis Rodriguez wrote:

James,

AFAIK, System-wide.

Empirically determined: Trigger names must be unique within a library, but not system-wide.

Definitely something I can use.

Thanks to both Charles and Dennis (Sorry, Dennis; at first, I didn't see that you also had the answer).

--
JHHL

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Avoiding redundant triggers? , Luis Rodriguez

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.