Re: Time increase going from V5R4 to V7R1 -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: Time increase going from V5R4 to V7R1
From: Bill <brobins3d@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 09:05:56 -0800
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

On 02/04/11 7:11 AM, Craig Jacobsen wrote:

Only problem is some Carriers need 2 labels and the Zebra 105SL used as a
remote outq doesn't handle it.
I just looped back through the code if 2 were required just like I did with
the socket stuff.
It went much faster by slowing the throughput buffer. Who would a thunk it?
(It's going into production Monday)

I do believe you can specify the number of copies to print in the data stream, no need to loop for multiple copies.

Bill

Follow-Ups:

RE: Time increase going from V5R4 to V7R1 , DeLong, Eric

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.