Re: Time increase going from V5R4 to V7R1 -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: Time increase going from V5R4 to V7R1
From: Bill <brobins3d@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 09:05:56 -0800
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

On 02/04/11 7:11 AM, Craig Jacobsen wrote:

Only problem is some Carriers need 2 labels and the Zebra 105SL used as a
remote outq doesn't handle it.
I just looped back through the code if 2 were required just like I did with
the socket stuff.
It went much faster by slowing the throughput buffer. Who would a thunk it?
(It's going into production Monday)

I do believe you can specify the number of copies to print in the data stream, no need to loop for multiple copies.

Bill

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

RE: Time increase going from V5R4 to V7R1 , DeLong, Eric

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.