RE: relational database -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: RE: relational database
From: David FOXWELL <David.FOXWELL@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 14:48:07 +0100
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

-----Message d'origine-----
De : midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx

It's not that the database isn't relational -
it's that the majority of i users don't describe it
it using relational techniques.

That's what I mean. I didn't write the DDS and I don't know much of relation techniques for DDS. But that makes MY data base non relational as it hasn't been described as it should.

Follow-Ups:

RE: relational database , Dennis
RE: relational database , Morgan, Paul

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.