Re: System Date - can it be 'intercepted' ? -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: System Date - can it be 'intercepted' ?
From: rob@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 15:35:44 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Changing all code from system date to job date is one option. However it
may not be an option if:
1 - You normally want to use system date (for those NEP's that span
dates).
2 - You are running vendor code and have not the source.
3 - It may be cost prohibitive to change all code to use job date if the
list can tell you a way to spoof the system date to another (just for this
job).

So, in those cases, good luck. If you can't find an answer here perhaps
the MI400 list?

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: System Date - can it be 'intercepted' ? , rob

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.