Re: System Date - can it be 'intercepted' ? -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: System Date - can it be 'intercepted' ?
From: Charles Wilt <charles.wilt@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 16:25:07 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

That was in response to Mark's post about changing the job date.

Honestly, I'd be surprised if TestTime didn't support versions prior to 6.1...

Charles

On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Jim Wiant <Jim.Wiant@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

As far as your next post, why wouldn't it work if they are using %date?
the TestTime/400 product claims that it can override all RPG date
requests.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

RE: System Date - can it be 'intercepted' ? , Jim Wiant

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.