While I generally understand your need to pontificate your knowledge of
the system, Larry is one of the most skilled IBM i hardware and system
administrators in the world, outside of IBM. We can find plenty of
references both inside and outside of IBM to back that up. For you to
immediately question his report, given the knowledge, advise, help, etc
that Larry has given not only to this list but nearly anyone that asks
for it is insulting to anyone that knows Larry.

Your analysis may be accurate, but in the long run not relevant because
none of it matters. What does matter is the landmine that could be
stepped on if this PTF is not applied. Larry reported it to this group
within hours of learning the problem, then testing the solution. Had
there been more relevant information to convey, he would have.

While Larry's sarcastic style may not be yours, the bottom line is it
was reported completely, accurately, and more importantly immediately.
Your comments did not add to the problem solution, only cast your own
doubts as to the validity of Larry's report and reputation furthermore
impeaching IBM Rochester's solution.

A bit of introspection is called for in this case, and in my view an
apology.

+1 Very well stated.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.