Any reason to keep old TSM lpp's? -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Any reason to keep old TSM lpp's?
From: rob@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 11:10:29 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Doing a system cleanup I noticed these:
Resource
ID Option Feature Description
5697TSM *BASE 5050 Tivoli Storage Manager
5697TSM *BASE 2924 Tivoli Storage Manager
5698ISX *BASE 5050 Tivoli Storage Manager
5698ISX *BASE 2924 Tivoli Storage Manager

Far as I remember TSM was as dead as it gets on the i. I still remember
when the director of marketing for the i moved to director of marketing
for tivoli and the first thing he did was drop Tivoli support for the i
(apparently he didn't leave happy).
We quickly spun up a Linux lpar.

But I just noticed these lpps still here and I wonder if I should just
delete them.

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.