Re: barcode scanenr for AS400 -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: barcode scanenr for AS400
From: Bill <brobins3d@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 08:23:05 -0700
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

On 03/17/11 10:55 AM, rob@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

We use Intermec CK31ex. We have the imager models. If they will never
need to scan 3D barcodes, I'd suggest NOT getting the imager models due to
slower scanning, shorter range, and in our case, more maintenance.

We use CK31's here. They have multiple emulation setup, so the user could switch between 5250 emulation for iSeries work and VT100 terminal emulation for barcode system work.

Bill

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

RE: barcode scanenr for AS400 , Brian Piotrowski

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.