Re: Allowable characters in field names, was Re: Distributing UDFs -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: Allowable characters in field names, was Re: Distributing UDFs
From: James Lampert <jamesl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 11:11:11 -0700
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

rob@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

Just because you can, doesn't mean you should. Suppose you send it to someone whose pound sign is more like the old British unit of monetary value?

$/#/@ are only relevant to user-defined field renaming (derived from PF field text) in locally- (and programmatically-) created views, so distribution isn't an issue.

--
JHHL

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.