It's IBM that requires direct access to the underlying file. First they wanted *ALLOBJ, and when we balked at that, they refined their request. I should be more specific: it's the WebSphere folks that want this information; they evidently haven't gotten the memo on the "new" access restrictions.

Joe

I think my earlier post explains it Joe. It's so that the user can get to
the underlying data via one of the views in QSYS2, like SYSCOLUMNS.


Rob Berendt


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.