Re: FNDSTRPDM is slow -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: FNDSTRPDM is slow
From: Gary Thompson <GThompson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 10:52:06 -0600
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Bryan wrote:

For years, doing an initial FNDSTRPDM on our production source file has
taken several minutes. (Just did one and it took 4 minutes). Is there
anyway to make it faster besides a cleanup of source? The file is about
400mb and has about 3,200 members. It's one of the slowest tasks I
routinely perform, but if I do a second FNDSTRPDM on the same day it
runs MUCH faster.

"one of the slowest tasks" 3,200 members in 4 minutes
(.075 seconds to open, scan, close a member)

I guess the bar just gets higher...

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

RE: FNDSTRPDM is slow , Burns, Bryan

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.