Jon,

There's obviously an advantage when doing a live event to be able to interact at some level with the audience. People attend (or wish to attend) because they want to hear *you* speak and potentially to ask questions on the spot.

Having a chat session going where someone collates the questions to feed you during the Q & A portion would add value by allowing people that can't physically be there to almost be there.

-mark


At 8/17/2011 10:16 PM, you wrote:
But those already exist in the form of webcasts or things like Penton't virtual conferences Mark. So I guesss I just don't see what the value is of adding it to an existing event.


On Aug 17, 2011, at 4:10 PM, midrange-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> Personally I'm more interested in looking at what's being presented vs. the presenter. I don't see the need for a camera, just some screen sharing app and audio that works through the computer's speakers. Even if you insisted on a camera crew, that is one person, and a backup to share among the rooms.

Jon Paris

www.partner400.com
www.SystemiDeveloper.com


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.