Re: Picking up an AUTL for newly created objects

Exactly like those!!

Jim Oberholtzer
Chief Technical Architect
Agile Technology Architects


On 9/7/2011 8:34 AM, rob@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

You mean like all those *QRYDFN's the users keep putting out there
whilly-nilly?
I tried changing the default library for their user profile. Seemed to
cause ill effects with our existing applications.


Rob Berendt
-- Group Dekko Dept 1600 Mail to: 2505 Dekko Drive Garrett, IN 46738 Ship to: Dock 108 6928N 400E Kendallville, IN 46755 http://www.dekko.com From: Jim Oberholtzer <midrangel@xxxxxxxxxx> To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: 09/07/2011 09:29 AM Subject: Re: Picking up an AUTL for newly created objects Sent by: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx As John suggested you can just put the AUTL on the library, or if you need to be getting any object that is created regardless of it's location, build a program to read the audit journal. Any time you see a create object, put the correct authority per your policy on it. I use that technique to move objects pesky consultants (like myself) and occasionally employees create in libraries like QGPL, QUSRSYS, etc. into more appropriate locations. Jim Oberholtzer Chief Technical Architect Agile Technology Architects On 9/6/2011 3:17 PM, ADriver@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Just wondering if anyone has any ideas on how to make sure a newly

created object picks up the authority of other objects in that library
(possibly a combination of private auth. and AUTL). Not talking about
*PUBLIC authority.

>
> I was looking at maybe registering an exit program on some of the CRT*

commands, but the issue I found is that there seems to be no CRTQRY
command for instance. There is a CRTQMQRY command, but we have a few users
that sue WRKQRY to create queries.

>
> I guess there is always the possibility of simply running a daily job

that assigns the correct AUTL and/or private authorities to new objects,
but I was hoping there is a way to do it at the point the object is
created.

>
> Am I on the right track with command exits, or is there a better way to

do this that anyone is aware of?

>
> Thanks
>
> Adam Driver
> IBM Certified Systems Administrator - System i
> Consultant - Infrastructure Technician
> Exacta Corporation
> 608.661.6697 ext 2581

--