RE: Dumb Terminal or Emulator

["Jerry C. Adams" <midrange@xxxxxxxx>]

James,

I *knew* when I was typing the question that I was going to hear from you in
this very vein!  I thought (for just a moment) of changing "dumb" to "device
not otherwise able to invoke a browser session" or something else as
verbose.

I'll try to be more precise in future queries to the List.  Nah... .-)

Jerry C. Adams
IBM i Programmer/Analyst
History is just one bloody thing after another. -Herbert Butterfield
--
A&K Wholesale
Murfreesboro, TN
615-867-5070


-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of James Lampert
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2011 10:47 AM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: Dumb Terminal or Emulator

Mark Murphy/STAR BASE Consulting Inc. wrote:
> One thing I don't understand about this is that code you write for a
> 5250 session does not run on the terminal whether it is a dumb
> terminal or a PC.  If you want to go out to a web service, it isn't
> the terminal doing it, it is the RPG program.  So that should still
> work regardless of the terminal type.  Of course if you want to do a
> RUNRMTCMD or STRPCCMD, then you can simply monitor for a message in
> the CL program, as someone already said.

And may I point out that since we're talking about 5250 devices, NOT 
Lear ADM-3s or other "glass teletypes" (nor even the much more advanced 
ADM-1s, Datamedia 1500s, Teleray 10s, or Dec VT-100s), your terminals 
can hardly be called "dumb."

--
JHHL