Re: Classes for IBMi/iSeries?

[Michael Ryan <michaelrtr@xxxxxxxxx>]

Yeah Charles...that's correct, and a good point. I've worked on all of
them, and, and it's a definite difference between the systems. But, if
a user was running JD Edwards on an AS/400, they probably wouldn't see
much of a difference running Oracle on an i, assuming green screen in
both cases.

On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Charles Wilt <charles.wilt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Correct me if I'm wrong...
>
> But my understanding, and I've never used a S/36 or S/38), is that
> from a green screen user's perspective, there's obvious differences
> between S/36, S/38 and AS/400....
>
> Now compare that to the difference's between AS/400, iSeries, System
> i, POWER running IBM i...
>
> It's no wonder the users still call it AS/400!
>
> Charles
>
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Trevor Perry <trevor@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Jerry,
> >
> > It was not quite clear.
> >
> > Did you call the AS/400 a S/36, because it could run S/36 applications?
> > Did you call the AS/400 a S/38, because it could run S/38 applications?
> >
> > If the answer is yes, then calling IBM i an AS/400 is the same thing.
> > If no, then...
> > Do you call IBM i an AS/400 because it can run AS/400 applications?
> --
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.