LOL - all is good now. For most people, it will not be an issue, because all this is part of the OS now, as of V5R4. This way it should not get lost. I guess there were a few issues with AC3 in the good old days!

Later
Vern

On 10/6/2011 10:57 AM, Dennis wrote:
Yowsie. Cryptography is confusig enough without adding this to the mix! Here's hoping it's finally resolved!

(That sounds like another software company, not like IBM, by the way.)
++
Dennis
++
"Advertising may be described as the science of arresting the human intelligence long enough to get money from it."
-- Stephen Leacock




Sent from my Galaxy tablet phone. Please excuse my brevity.
For any grammatic/spelling errors, there is no excuse.
++


"Vern Hamberg"<vhamberg@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

To all who might need this information - turns out that before V5R4,
licensed product 5722-AC3 was required to use the encryption
algorithms.
Apparently the export restriction was lifted, and V5R4 and later have
the algorithms in the operating system - this is why 57xx-AC3 was
pulled, I suppose.

Now another wrinkle - we DO have AC3 on our V5R1 box - yet the extra
algorithms did not show up. Turns out there was a problem where the MI
stuff that AC3 modified/added could get lost, usually when moving from
one machine to another.

One solution is to SAVLICPGM/DLTLICPGM/RSTLICPGM - the note I saw said
that the self-certificates had to be rebuilt.

HTH
Vern

On 10/2/2011 9:33 AM, Mark S. Waterbury wrote:
Hi, Vern:

I compiled and ran your program on V5R2 and the results are the same
as
what you show for V5R1.

Mark S. Waterbury

> On 10/1/2011 12:17 PM, Vern Hamberg wrote:
Hi all

Scott Klement has some code that displays which algorithms are
supported
on the release you are running. At V5R1, there are only 4 of them
(MAC,
MD5, SHA-1, and DES (two-way).

At V5R3 there are 10 more.

I need to know what the algorithms are at V5R2 - maybe it's
documented
somewhere, I looked in MTU - nothing there. I don't have the MI docs
for
CIPHER at V5R2, InfoCenter doesn't have them anywhere that're
obvious to me.
Here is an amended version of Scott's code, usable at V5R1 and on -
his
takes advantage of LIKEDS in data structure subfields, which wasn't
available that far back.

Maybe someone still has a V5R2 system/partition - if so, please
compile
and run this code and let me know the results.

Much appreciated!
Vern
...(snip)...

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.