On Oct 7, 2011, at 4:02 PM, midrange-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

Scott suggested that too and we're going to explore its use as well. I
had been thinking that using the MI instruction might provide better
throughput as we are looking at running this for a high volume
application.

The RPG BIF will in all probability resolve down the to the same set of instructions as the MI. Remember MI != hardware instruction. In many cases when an MI built-in is coded in a C program the compiler replaces it with equivalent in-line instructions. The callable MI function is only there to fulfill C's need to be able to take a pointer to any function. But that callable function will rarely be used by a compiled C program. The RPG BIF almost certainly goes to the same underlying machine instructions.


Jon Paris

www.partner400.com
www.SystemiDeveloper.com





As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.