RE: IBM System Storage TS3100 Tape library; unnecessary tapeverification by restoring object? -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: RE: IBM System Storage TS3100 Tape library; unnecessary tapeverification by restoring object?
From: rob@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 14:18:12 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

True. But I wonder about the "grab a month end backup". I wonder if they
test bringing that up to current using each day's backups?

We use BRMS. Each day it prints us off a report that says if we have to
do a complete restore we will need these volumes: X, Y, Z (assuming that X
was from our full system save and the others were in between). And then it
gives us the step by step instructions to restore our system back to a
running state. I pdf that report daily and distribute it to three pc
servers, two of which are in different countries.

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

RE: IBM System Storage TS3100 Tape library; unnecessary tapeverification by restoring object? , Musselman, Paul

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.