In one instance it's me. I can't even open a connection without having
to signon, even though I'll have multiple PC5250 sessions open.
The other instance is a procurement analyst who's trying to download
data into MS Access. Her co-worker doesn't have to re-authenticate to
perform a similar function, but she does.
And, I used to not have to re-authenticate just to open a connection,
but I'm not sure what I changed.
Bryan
-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of rob@xxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2011 8:39 AM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: System i signon to iNav
It all depends. For example, if you are using iNav to run DNS server on
your i then you'll need Godlike authority on the system. Which went
over
really well with people here with 20+ years experience in our department
who don't have that but an outside network consultant who wouldn't know
a
WRKSPLF if it stared him in the face, does.
So basically, it depends on the individual service they are trying to
use
in iNav.
Other factors to consider:
- What ports are blocked from this person? Check the wiki and IBM
infocenter and whatnot for what ports are needed by various functions of
iNav.
- We don't use SSL here for local users (ducking and running, in a
serpentine fashion). So, if you have some stuff set up that way you may
notice that.
Rob Berendt
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.