There's no legitimate security reasons for not configuring the DNS resolver (CHGTCPDMN). In every case I've seen, when it's not set, it's because of ignorance.

Setting this won't prevent "personal web surfing". Someone clever enough to set up a browser on IBM i (a non-trivial task) won't be stopped bypassing DNS settings. If you wan to block personal web surfing, it should be done with a firewall.


On 1/3/2012 12:01 PM, James Lampert wrote:
Is there any legitimate security -- or even "personal web-surfing
prevention" -- reason for *not* setting DNS address(es) in CHGTCPDMN?

We have a customer who wanted us to interface with a public web service,
for which a host table entry isn't enough (the service moves around),
and when I finally get something kind-of sort-of ready for alpha-test, I
find out that they have no DNS entries, and therefore can't reach the
service.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.