This testing theory pretty much goes out the window when ADDLIBLE QBRM is
embedded into the code and it's not like someone does that before hand. If
it was done before hand and the average user was testing new versions of
BRMS they could do an ADDLIBLE QBRMNEW or some such thing. However, the
average user doesn't test new versions of BRMS - IBM does.

As far as copying commands into QSYS, they aren't 'copied' anymore.
Instead IBM creates 'proxy' commands. You will see the difference between
DSPCMD QSYS/WRKCTLGBRM
and
DSPCMD QBRM/WRKCTLGBRM

It's kinda like a 'symbolic link' in the IFS.


Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.