The auditing could be made to be very specific, and that could limit
the amount of data produced. However not knowing what the users are
claiming not to have done, I can see the concern, because the targeting
of the auditing to specific actions\object would not be possible except
perhaps when there is an attempt to verify any _specific_ assumption
about what they may be doing that gives origin to some difficulty.
FWiW I actually almost never signed off, always using DSCJOB instead.
There is the possibility if the environment allows [named devices], to
use the change command API to insert a Disconnect Job request before
forcing the SIGNOFF LOG(*LIST) if the disconnect request ends with
CPF1358 "DSCJOB not allowed." In my experience the actual "active" job
is *way better* than just the spooled joblog in many cases. On my
systems I changed the QDSCJOBITV "Time interval before disconnected jobs
end" to 1440 or *NONE, to ensure my disconnected jobs would be there the
next day or longer.
Regards, Chuck
On 06-Jan-2012 12:05 , Jerry C. Adams wrote:
Thought about that, too. Kinda tight on disk space here, though.
<<SNIP>>
Mark Walter on Friday, January 06, 2012 1:41 PM
What sort of things are the users saying they're not doing? Audit
Journals may be more help than joblogs depending on what's
happening.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.