Re: Breaking in to ILE -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: Breaking in to ILE
From: rob@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 11:02:04 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

I think it depends on shop. For example you may be externalizing I/O and
by table may make sense for you. Then again, it may not. Because if
you're externalizing I/O the name of the 'table' shouldn't matter.

Organizing by application may be applicable. For example: A/P, A/R, etc.
Or even by software vendor.

We have very few custom service programs. I think they are all in our
ROUTINES library. All prototypes for the various procedures in those
service programs are in QPROTOSRC.

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

RE: Breaking in to ILE , DeLong, Eric

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.