Re: Never mind, Re: Finer points of named activation groups -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: Never mind, Re: Finer points of named activation groups
From: Jon Paris <jon.paris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 11:00:33 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

On Jan 26, 2012, at 8:36 AM, midrange-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

Actually, only minutes after I asked the question, I got something
straight from the equine masticatory orifice: activation groups meeting
some standard of "idleness" are being systematically reclaimed. Whether
the program doing the reclaiming knows anything about them or not.

I find that really really hard to believe. Where did you get this information?

Jon Paris

www.partner400.com
www.SystemiDeveloper.com

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Never mind, Re: Finer points of named activation groups , Dave

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.