Re: Never mind, Re: Finer points of named activation groups -- now an SQLCLI question -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: Never mind, Re: Finer points of named activation groups -- now an SQLCLI question
From: Buck <kc2hiz@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:09:32 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

On 1/26/2012 11:32 AM, James Lampert wrote:

Buck wrote:

I thought I'd read the ILE manuals cover to
cover, but it's possible I missed the part where the system reclaims
idle AGs. It can be dry reading at times.

I never said the *OS* was reclaiming activation groups according to some
arbitrary definition of idleness.

I said that the *customer* (in some meshugga "change environment"
program that's part of their native multi-environment application) is
reclaiming them.

Ah, thanks. I understood 'horse's mouth' to mean IBM rather than the
customer.
--buck

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.