Re: Replace Disk Unit Under Parity Protection -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: Replace Disk Unit Under Parity Protection
From: rob@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 14:52:21 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

It's been a spell since I've had a 270. And there were some weird
configurations like a drive was only eligible for concurrent maintenance
if things were just so, like you had a sidecar or some such thing.

Pete and Larry are probably better choices for this. That is, if they
remember much about the 270.

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.