Re: Save While Active -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: Save While Active
From: Joe Pluta <joepluta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 07:45:46 -0600
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

On 3/6/2012 7:29 AM, rob@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

In summary, you are saying just because you use such a HA solution this
doesn't negate the need for commitment control. Good point and good
explanation.

Thanks everyone. This gave me a lot of food for thought. I'll be addressing this later this week. We're using more and more commitment control here and it will be interesting to see how that affects our processes.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.