RE: survey: frequency of in-house coded software enhancement promotions to production -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: RE: survey: frequency of in-house coded software enhancement promotions to production
From: rob@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 11:20:26 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Frequent promotion does not exclude testing. I see nothing in there which
inferred that he didn't have a test/development lpar, a user review
committee and so on. Heck, as far as you know, he may have even purchased
automated testing tools to run that through a battery of tests. Might
even have display or web emulators to test it out.

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

RE: survey: frequency of in-house coded software enhancement promotions to production , Alan Shore
RE: survey: frequency of in-house coded software enhancement promotions to production , Mark Murphy/STAR BASE Consulting Inc.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.