Joel -
Some reasons for qualifying the library in a CL program:
http://www.itjungle.com/tfh/tfh012003-story04.html
I have other reasons, will reply later with additional information.
Hint: There are some very good reasons for qualifying the IBM commands used
in certain CL programs to QSYS.
- sjl
Joel wrote:
What are some of the CL programming standards that your shop has found
valuable?
I would think that a few standards are NEVER have the following in
production CL:
- never have a library name in CL (OK allow QTEMP)
- never have even a variable library name in CL
- never have a person's name or email address in CL (OK in author comments)
Would a library in CL ever be necessary? I would think that good coding
would allow the *libl to do the work of choosing the correct lib in almost
all cases.
Comments and additional good practices?
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
