Re: Is 6.1 'beta' and 7.1 the more stable release? -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: Is 6.1 'beta' and 7.1 the more stable release?
From: CRPence <CRPbottle@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 12:54:49 -0700
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

On 09 May 2012 11:09, rob@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

Is IBM 'testing' PTFs on 6.1 by releasing them there first and then
releasing the 7.1 versions a week or two later?

Let's look at the planned release for DB2 group PTFs at
http://tinyurl.com/db2group
or
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/wikis/home?lang=en#/wiki/IBM%20i%20Technology%20Updates/page/DB2%20for%20IBM%20i%202012%20Group%20PTF%20Schedule

and many of the enhancements match this up. Look at left window
under functional enhancements.

Any PTF on a group has been made Generally Available\Announced (GA). Thus there is no 'beta' on either release.

Regards, Chuck

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.