FWIW going to v6 or v7 from a lower release requires the object
conversions, from v6 to v7 there's no MAJOR changes or hurdles to
upgrading. I'm firmly in the keep up-to-date camp right there with
you...but i'm sure you know that sarcasm, etc doesn't work too well in a
written "flat" medium ;)





From: rob@xxxxxxxxx
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Date: 05/17/2012 07:40 AM
Subject: Re: Is 6.1 'beta' and 7.1 the more stable release?
Sent by: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx



Jim,

I was being honest. I was the one spreading the FUD. I am the one
encouraging 7.1. I have full faith that IBM is fully supporting 6.1 and
7.1. V5R4 dies in September as it states in
http://www-947.ibm.com/systems/support/i/planning/upgrade/suptschedule.html

as the longest supported OS in the history of the line. Totally blowing
away all previous records.

I just don't get people upgrading to 6.1 and not 7.1. Vendor issues?
Switch vendors. I switched change management vendors and others because
they dragged their feet on getting to 6.1. I'm sure not going to stick by

someone who can't get from 6.1 to 7.1 when 7.1 has been GA for over two
years.


Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.