Rob, I will not disagree that a customer written program is not subject to constant review and update as PTFs and/or upgrades are done. However a customer written back up is superior to the save options being discussed since IBM has not, nor will not update/enhance them. Critically if the customer does not completely understand what is being backed up and when, a recovery becomes at best problematic if not impossible due to missing objects.

Jim Oberholtzer
Chief Technical Architect
Agile Technology Architects


On 6/14/2012 6:51 AM, rob@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
<snip>
I differ. I often question home grown back up programs before IBM
supplied utilities. After all, how many shops probably ran for awhile
using programs that didn't have the stream file save of just SAV after
that was introduced? How many shops probably still don't realize that
ENDSBS *ALL doesn't kill all of TCP/IP any more and you really should run
ENDTCP -before- running the ENDSBS?
</snip>

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.