Hi Michael
I have steered away from using ERRMSGID once I discovered something
We had a program that was using ERRMSGID throughout the DDS.
So much so that we were rapidly running out of indicators.
Then we started having problems with what was being displayed was NOT what should have been displayed.
Using STRDBG we could verify that data WAS being changed on the DDS but was NOT being displayed.
It looked like the program and DDS were being controlled by gremlins.
Then I discovered that as soon as an indicator used on ERRMSGID was switched on, any other thing changed on the DDS was not changed in the buffer.
And that was intentional
Since then, we changed that program to use message subfiles (no need for indicators) and the code is self-documenting as to what the problem is.
It took a while to change the program, but since then, NEVER used ERRMSGID, and the programs are not haunted by gremlins
Alan Shore
Programmer/Analyst, Direct Response
E:AShore@xxxxxxxx
P:(631) 200-5019
C:(631) 880-8640
"If you're going through Hell, keep going" - Winston Churchill
-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Michael Schutte
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2012 4:05 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Issue with Protect Field Using And Indicators. V7R1
We've just upgraded to V7R1 not sure if it makes a difference. However, I'm having this strange issue with field protection on this single record format display.
*In98 is turned on when it's time for the user to scan in a location to put product away. When 98 is on, I want to protect the @QTY field from being changed. However, there's a check after the scanned location is validated where the quantity entered is compared to the amount of space that is left in the scanned location. If the quantity entered is greater than the room left in the location, indicator 62 is turned on and re-displayed to the user however, the field is still protected. I'm just not seeing why I cannot type in that field now. I know that "98N62" is an AND condition.
Could someone please point out my error?
I know that 62 is turned on because the @QTY is highlighted and positioned too. I know that 98 is on because the location field is still shown on the display. I've also debugged the program and checked the values prior to EXFMT being executed. I thought maybe the screen was locked because of the error. But I've pressed reset and tried, still not able to type in the field.
A @QTY 16A B 5 6
A 62 DSPATR(RI)
A 62 DSPATR(PC)
A 52 ERRMSGID(IDU0503 *LIBL/WISDOMSG 52)
A 62 ERRMSGID(CAP0001 *LIBL/ODWMSGF2 62 -
A &RPLTXT)
A 98N62 DSPATR(PR)
A* suggested putaway location and actual putaway.
A 98 11 1'Sug:'
A DSPATR(HI)
A 98 @SUGLC 16A O 11 6TEXT('Location')
A 53 ERRMSGID(ILU0504 *LIBL/WISDOMSG 53)
A 98 12 1'Loc:'
A COLOR(WHT)
A DSPATR(HI)
A 98 @LOCAT 16A B 12 6TEXT('Location')
A 53 ERRMSGID(ILU0504 *LIBL/WISDOMSG 53)
Let me know if you need more information. I cannot think of anything else that you would need. Maybe a PTF is needed?
Here is a screen shot after the capacity check is made.
http://tinypic.com/r/20kf4fa/6
Thank you in advanced.
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit:
http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at
http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
Disclaimer: This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If verification is required please request a hard-copy version. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the company.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.