Re: Indexed PF vs. LF performance -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: Indexed PF vs. LF performance
From: rob@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 09:03:30 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Also, as far as testing; you have to be very careful. There may be things
active like shared open data paths, SQL would have the plan cache, and
there could be a host of other issues like what other jobs were running at
the time? Were the records in the same physical order in the data?
(Thinking back to early suggestions to reorg your data.)

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.