|
In my case, I would make that architecture decision based on
requirements.
Same here. I've been using more sequential, numeric identity keys lately, but Rob had a good point about the State Code table. The state code is a lot more descriptive than a numeric identifier, and easier to remember for data entry, and very unlikely to change.
Consistency is a consideration but not an overriding
one.
I agree.
The trick is deciding when they are appropriate, and that
can be different for different circumstances.
One question I ask myself is whether there might be any cause to allow users to change an otherwise descriptive key field in a maintenance program. Maybe it's a data warehouse used for reporting where rules of normalization may not strictly apply. If so, then use an identity key rather than a descriptive one.
-Nathan.
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.