Re: Pros and Cons of DB defined Referential Integrity Constraints -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: Pros and Cons of DB defined Referential Integrity Constraints
From: rob@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 07:36:05 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

There have been numerous discussions on coding RPG's WRITE processing on
where the break even point is, performance wise, on prechecking versus
just doing it with %error on the write. Apparently it takes quite a few
before prechecking is worth it. But most people who do the %error do
remove the error from the joblog, IF, they've successfully handled it
within the program.

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.